Trying To Keep Warm

Walked outside this morning to discover the first autumn chill of October had finally arrived at my door. Just a couple of days ago the temperatures refused to drop below 80 degrees and the lingering humidity proved just as stubborn.

This morning was a sobering, yet familiar reminder about how the days will most certainly grow colder before the return of Spring can once again warm my heart. With each day that passes I get closer and closer to the coldest day of the year for me, October 22.     

Those who don’t know me well might wonder, what makes October 22 so cold? Well it was the day that a very bright light in my life went out. A light that aggravated and provoked me every chance it could up through high school. In college, however, this light became a best friend and allowed me the chance to serve as its best man.

That light was my brother, Marcus. Though I do my best to keep warm with God’s word and time spent with family and friends, the chill of October 22 still seeps in my heart every year. Rather than a sign that something is wrong, I’ve been thinking recently that perhaps this chill in my heart means I’m doing something right.

Rather than fully insulating my heart from everything and everyone, the chill signifies my efforts to keep my heart open to new possibilities and relationships even if it allows loss to seep in. Therefore, I continue to see the great challenge of grief rests not so much in attempting to avoid the cold, but in trying to keep warm.

CJE          

The Strength To Submit

22 Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the Lord.23 For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. 24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.

25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her 26 to make her holy, cleansing[b] her by the washing with water through the word, 27 and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. 28 In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. 29 After all, no one ever hated their own body, but they feed and care for their body, just as Christ does the church— 30 for we are members of his body.31 “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh.”[c32 This is a profound mystery—but I am talking about Christ and the church. 33 However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband.

-Ephesians 5:21-33

Good afternoon. One would hope that the word, “FAMILY,” comes to mind when he or she thinks of their church. But what does that mean? Why does this truth totally change how members in a church perceive one another? How does this truth completely alter the way members in a church family interact with one another? In other words, church members must ask each other, “what am I to you and what are you to me?”

Lets be clear, our associations to one another extend well beyond the bounds ordinary peers who share the same faith. Nor do our connections to one another limit themselves to the constraints of mere acquaintances who occupy the same pew. And above all, our obligations to one another reach so much farther than the confines of close friends who gather at the same building.  

In putting forth a proper understanding of family, Eph 5 speaks directly to all that keeps a marriage and a church together, and indirectly cautions against all that causes a marriage or a church to come undone. Eph 5 aims to speak not only to husbands and wives on how to keep their relationship healthy and vibrant, but also shows concern for brothers and sisters in church keeping their relationship strong and energetic.

Eph 5 replaces a prior understanding of marriage and church defined by our culture with a Christ-centered view of family and church. Seen through the lens of Christ, Eph 5 redefines every role in both married life and in church life. Eph 5 show us what it truly means to be a husband and a wife, what it genuinely means to be a brother and a sister within a church family.

When beginning to address similarities between a marriage and the church, Eph 5 begins with this instruction in v. 21, “Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ.”  In freshman English class you might hear lead sentences like this one referred to as a thesis statement. In one sentence, a good thesis statement encapsulates the author’s main point. The author proceeds to defend their thesis statement in the subsequent paragraphs.

So when you or I enter into a marriage or a church, what should be our first response according to Eph 5? What is our opening act? Is it to mark our territory? Is it to make demands? No, it is TO SUBMIT. Perhaps one best understands Christ-centered submission by first identifying what Christ-centered submission DOES NOT represent.  

By its definition, one submits by yielding to the authority or will of another, or when one consents to adhere to the opinion or authority of another. In either case, a part of Christ-centered submission is the element of choice. History painfully teaches that any effort at submission without consent quickly escalates into violence and oppression. Today too many family members from both inside and outside the church find themselves threaten or beaten into submission, and by “too many” I mean more than ZERO.

By no means does Eph 5 encourage one to submit the insults, neglect or bruises inflicted by family or church members. To suggest otherwise not only misleads families, but such falsehoods put families in danger. One does not submit to the abuses inflicted by their families or churches if only because Christ never created the family or the church for such purposes.

According to Eph 5, Christ made the family and the church holy and blameless without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish. In the place of stains, wrinkles, and blemishes, Christ created the family and the church for the purpose of satisfying the one need all God’s children share, and that is the need for love.

Therefore, it is only in the context of a family or a church freely choosing to love one another as the Lord loves them that Eph 5 instructs one to submit. Ironically, only when referencing our enemies does Scripture encourages us to bear abuses, endure persecutions, and risk broken bones. Because if anyone hurts us or harms us, please let it be by our enemies and not by our family or our church.

And if not submission, then what is the Christ-centered response to the abuses and pain caused by families and churches? That’s a good question, and one that does not come with easy answers. Nevertheless, all of us need to consider how we respond in such situations when one abuses the privileges of family and church.

Because one of the great strengths of both a family and a church resonates in the fact that neither exist as social clubs or country clubs that handpick its members based on mutual interest or admiration. Though as a child I confess there were days when I would not have hesitated to trade my brother for a video game and a pack of chewing gum. Yet thankfully for my brother and for us, our admittance to a family or a church does not depend one’s personal consent.

This great strength, however, only reinforces Satan’s resolve to find a weakness and exploit it. Like its pursuit of Judas, Satan searches endlessly through a family or a church for those most susceptible to betrayal. And by engineering betrayal so unexpected and so devastating, Satan hopes such betrayal destroy one’s faith, family, church all at once.

By acknowledging Satan’s presence in abuses suffered within a family or a church, it helps us to know how we MUST respond when such abuses occur. While submit has many antonyms, the ones most appropriate for Christians when responding to abuse in a family or a church are CONFRONT, COUNTER, and if necessary, REPEL.

First, a family or a church must CONFRONT any abuse caused by another within their walls. Families and churches must deny any impulse to remain ignorant or keep quiet when one of its members comes to harm. Instead, families and churches must acknowledge the suffering of victims and commit all its resources to their healing. Only when brought into the light of day can the darkness of such terrible acts be driven out.

Second, a family or a church must COUNTER any abuse inflicted by someone under their same roof. When responding to the pain of its members, families and churches must resist any urge to meet abuse with abuse, any desire to greet injury with injury.

Rather than responding in kind, families and churches respond differently by infusing their discipline for the perpetrator with mercy and filling their consequences for the victim with justice. Only when both parties are treated differently than the behavior they showed or the actions they endured can the open wounds of such awful deeds be closed.

Third, a family or a church must REPEL any abuse committed by someone sitting at their table. When good faith efforts at confronting and countering fail, families and churches must suppress any urge to delay in repelling those who persist in their plans to harm them.

While never surrendering their hope in a abuser’s capacity to change, families and churches must surround themselves with physical and emotional boundaries until such change occurs. Only when sensing a considerable distance between themselves and harm can families and churches begin to feel safe.

Now that we know what Christ-centered submission does not signify, let us seek to understand what how a marriage teaches a church to submit as Christ intended. Eph 5 begins by focusing its attention on the duty of the wife when it says in v.24,”24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.” How then does a church model its submission to Christ and each other after the wife’s example in Eph 5?

First, a wife’s submission to her husband says to him, “I Support You Always.” So if I want to communicate my unwavering support of Christ, then like the wife I submit my will to Christ’s requests. Should I desire to express my steadfast support of you, then I submit my wants to your needs.   

Second, a wife’s submission to her husband conveys to him, “I Trust You Completely.” So if I want to articulate my resolute trust in Christ, then like the wife I submit my plans to Christ’s will. Should I want to express my stanch trust in you, then I submit my fears to your confidence.

Third, a wife’s submission to her husband imparts to him, “I Respect You Deeply.” So if I want to convey my deep respect for Christ, then like the wife I submit my sovereignty to Christ’s authority. Should I seek to express my profound respect for you, then I submit my stupidity to your wisdom.

From the conduct of the wife, Eph 5 sets its attention on the responsibilities of the husband saying in v.25, “25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her 26 to make her holy, cleansing[b] her by the washing with water through the word, 27 and to present her to himself as a radiant church, without stain or wrinkle or any other blemish, but holy and blameless. 28 In this same way, husbands ought to love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself29 After all, no one ever hated their own body, but they feed and care for their body, just as Christ does the church— 30 for we are members of his body.”

When first entering into marriage, I would imagine most husbands naturally feel overwhelmed when presented with the task of keeping his family together. Similarly, I suspect most elders initially feel overwhelmed when charged with the duty of keeping their church together.

Thankfully, Eph 5 calms the fears of both husbands and elders by encouraging them to perform three specific acts for their families. Certainly these three acts do not represent an exhaustive list for a Christ-centered husband or elder to perform. However, Eph 5 certainly expects them to be carried out with regularity.

Moreover, Eph 5 remains convinced that the more husbands and elders practice these acts, the more they find themselves capable and successful in carrying out their responsibilities.  How then does the church reflect its care for Christ and for each other when following after the husband’s example in Eph 5?

First, a husband responds to his wife’s submission with love. So just as the husband surrenders his anger to love his wife, then I too submit my sins to Christ’s forgiveness. When it comes to showing my love for you, then I submit my transgressions to your mercy.

Second, a husband responds to his wife’s submission with sacrifice. So just as the husband sacrifices his pride to bring honor to his wife, then I too submit my pride to Christ’s glory. When it comes to conveying my willingness to sacrifice for you, I submit my ego to your humility.

Third, a husband responds to his wife’s submission with provision. So just as the husband takes from his bounty to provide for his wife, then I too submit my plenty to Christ’s needs. When it comes expressing my desire to share my provisions with you, I submit my abundance to your scarcity.

For those who might be thinking, “Chris, you paint a pretty picture of submission, but it’s not that easy, it’s not simple.” Well, you’re right. Regardless of translation, does anyone find words like “easy” and “simple” in Eph 5? Besides the being standard for truth, I appreciate Scripture so much for setting the benchmark for honesty.

Free of exaggeration and romanticism, Eph 5 infuses its depiction of life in a marriage with candor and reality. Absent of hyperbole and fantasy, Eph 5 injects its description of life in a church with sincerity and certainty.  How does Eph 5 portray marriage and church in v.32? Yeah, it calls them both, “…a profound mystery…”

Mystery always exists beyond our control. An individual cannot create or solve mystery. Mystery can only be tolerated and appreciated when one submits, when one kneels before what is more than himself or herself. And though mysteries are never easy or simple; they are still possible and they can still be beautiful.

But what makes marriage and church “not so simple” and “not so easy,” and thereby making the act of submitting not so appealing or inviting? Well I think we start by trying to understand what causes submission to occur so infrequently in our culture.  

As prevalent as Coca-Cola and McDonalds, individualism and competition represent two of the most recognizable brands produce by our society. On almost every street corner, individualism finds willing buyers in need of a doctrine that suggests the interests and rights of the individual not only supersede all else, but originate in the individual.

The virtual absence of submission in such a competitive and fragmented society only magnifies the importance marriage and church. The counter-culture created by marriage and church serves as a cure against the sinful diseases arising out of competition and individualism. Marriage and church refuse to individualize our identity, but insist rather that we are members of one another and subject one another.

For we discover the remedy to the sin of seeking my own way with God by submitting to the truth that we cannot obtain salvation on our own. We find the cure for the sin of wanting one’s own way with their spouse or their children by submitting to the fact that one cannot make it on my own.

Marriage and church also exist to remind us that we do not make the most of ourselves by ourselves, but making the most of relationships with one another. And despite competition and individualism efforts to convince us otherwise, the best relationships in marriage and church never come about by overpowering the other. No, the best relationships in marriage and church happen when we partake of the fruits of submission.

Though the fruits of submission are many, intimacy and responsibility represent two of them. While the possibility of relationships exists for those who only yield to their desires, those relationships are destined to be distant, shallow, and infrequent. They may come to be known as a buddy, a pal, and maybe even a companion. But they will never know what it means to be called a husband and a wife, a father and a mother, a son and a daughter, or a brother and sister.

Only through submission can relationships in marriage and church reach the depths of intimacy. For it is in the depths of intimacy where a husband and a wife experience the birth of their children, and where believers witness the rebirth of their brothers and sisters in baptism, and where a brother finds himself having to tell his parents that their son has died.

And from this intimate family language used both in Eph 5 and between each other comes the fruit of responsibility.  While those who only surrender to their wants can display feelings of care and concern, those feelings are fated to be convenient, quick, and few. They may collect a buddy’s mail, run to the store for a sick pal, or even cut a neighbor’s grass. But they will never know what it means to care for an ailing spouse, work multiple jobs so their children can go to college, or serve free meals on Wednesday nights to those who need it.  

Only through submission can relationships in marriage and church experience the privilege of responsibility. For it is the privilege of responsibility where a husband and wife work side by side changing diapers and transporting kids to soccer games, and where widows and orphans in their distress are looked after.

Looking back v21, Eph 5 instructs us marriages and churches on how they are to give meaning to their submission. Marriages and churches do not submit begrudgingly or robotic-ally. According to Eph 5, what is it spurs us to submit? REVERENCE FOR CHRIST. Reverence itself signifies more than awe or respect, but also entails a sense fear and trembling. Without reverence for Christ, submission becomes much less radical and much less powerful. More importantly, without reverence for Christ we become susceptible to the habits of irreverence.

Taken together, it is submission and reverence for Christ that changes how marriages and churches perceive one another. It is submission and reverence for Christ that alter the way marriages and churches interact with one another. It submission and reverence for Christ that transform the responsibilities marriages and churches assume for one another.

Let there be no doubt, submission and reverence for Christ requires much of marriages and churches. They will require marriages and churches to set the standard for love. Where competition and individualism fuel of hate and division, marriages and churches nourish efforts at compassion and unity. Submission and reverence for Christ will also demand marriages and churches become the benchmark for sacrifice. Where competition and individualism advocate greed and indulgence, marriages and churches promote generosity and self-control.  

But for as much as they ask of marriages and churches, submission and reverence for Christ also have much to give. For where competition and individualism see weakness, marriages and churches find their strength. And this is my prayer for all of us as we prepare to meet the week ahead of us. That whether in your in marriage or in your church, I pray God always bestows unto you the strength to submit.

CJE


Christ Is Meant To Be Eaten

John 6:51-58

6:51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh."6:52 The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, "How can this man give us his flesh to eat?"

6:53 So Jesus said to them, "Very truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you.6:54 Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood have eternal life, and I will raise them up on the last day;6:55 for my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink.6:56 Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me, and I in them.

6:57 Just as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever eats me will live because of me.6:58 This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like that which your ancestors ate, and they died. But the one who eats this bread will live forever."

Good morning. In our culture today there exists no more misleading concept, no more false idea than the notion of Reality TV. Presented as real and unscripted, reality tv programs represent some of the most staged productions available to viewers. Even if it weren’t staged, who among us lives the Kardashian or Real Housewives luxurious lifestyle?

One of my favorite quotes about reality tv comes from the opening credits of the movie, The Truman Show, when a supporting actor remarks, “Everything on the show is real, it’s just controlled.” Seamless changes in camera angles might give the appearance of full disclosure to the viewer. The truth, however, is that a show’s editor has to cut and delete segments of film to make every camera angle change feel continuous.

Even if most missing segments comprise only a couple seconds, the fact that the editor prevents the viewer from seeing the full picture inevitably prevents reality tv from meeting the standards of reality and truth. What are the standards for reality and truth, you ask? Well in a world that grows more electronic and detached by the day, the bar for what one accepts as real and true sinks lower and lower.

In John 6, however, one discovers how the Lord’s Supper becomes our basis for our reality and for our truth. A reality that so much bigger than the screen on one’s phones, a truth so much more personal than the tweets and texts one’s phone can transmit.

Now admittedly, Jesus’ opening statement at the end of John 6 comes off as awkward. Like the Jews present, I’m confidant all of would have had the same reaction, “What does He mean? Eat me?” But lets not allow this awkward pause keep us from hearing what Jesus wants to hear.

First, Jesus obviously does intend to have himself cut up into appetizers right here in John 6. Rather in John 6, Jesus makes known his desire for us to experience the fullness of a life spent in relationship with Him. You see Jesus doesn’t want to just merely believe in the reality He speaks of, Jesus wants to become A PART of that reality. 

Second in John 6, Jesus makes clear the nourishment He provides is real and true, and thereby suggesting that sustenance from any other source inevitably shows itself to be counterfeit and false. In v.55, Jesus says, “for my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink. When compared with the flesh of Jesus, John 6 considers eating any other food like eating from the garbage can.  When compared to the blood of Jesus, John 6 thinks drinking some other drink like drinking from the toilet bowl.

Now what makes Jesus’ flesh and blood the true food and true drink? I believe it rests in fact that both the flesh and the blood of Jesus are completely and totally whole. For there is nothing that the flesh of Jesus lacks, nor is there any need that the flesh of Jesus can’t meet. There is no scenario where the blood of Jesus comes up deficient, nor is there any sin that the blood of Jesus can’t cover.

And when I think the world of competing realties and “truths” in which we live, it is the wholeness of a thing or a person that helps me to determine what is real and what is fake, helps me decipher what is true and what is false. How can we be certain that we are loved by our friends, children, or spouses? Yeah, because the love between the two is complete, it is whole, never insufficient or deficient.

Finally in John 6, Jesus shows great concern for our proximity not only to what is real and true, but our proximity to each other. How does v56 read? Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide NEAR me? Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide BEHIND me? Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide BELOW me? No, those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide IN me.

This how close Jesus proclaims we must be to what is real and true. He wants us not merely to stand at the periphery of what is real and true. Instead, Jesus desires us to live daily IN the truth, and continually breathe IN the reality HE revealed to us. For John 6 remains convinced that which is phony and dishonest ultimately comes to ruin, but that which is real and true endures forever. So it is with the body and blood of Jesus Christ, and so is it with our love for one another.

What about our proximity to each other? Too many times we forget that how Jesus interacts with us always serves to teach us how we should interact with each other. You see I don’t just need you around the edges of my life where you pass through every now and then on your way to some place else. No, I need you IN my life to join in my celebrations and share my burdens.

This week may all of us put distance between us and that which is bogus and inaccurate. Instead, let us all draw closer to what is real and what is true. And let us never forget that while Christ is meant to be worshipped, Christ is also meant to be eaten.

CJE

Love Is A Choice

Good morning. In John 15, Jesus speaks about the kind of relationship he desires to have with His disciples. In v14, Jesus says the following, “14You are my friends if you do what I command.” Do you find anything strange about Jesus’ statement? Let me read it again, “14You are my friends if you do what I command.”

Well I don’t know what you think of when you hear the word, command, but I think of something being mandatory or being given an order. In other words, not optional. And yet how does Jesus preface his command in v.14? With IF.

True or False: Jesus possessed both the power and authority to express v.14 this way, “do what I command!”? True. This kind of relationship, however, did not appeal to Jesus. A relationship corrupted by force and control where a servant was bound to their master not by affection, but by obligation.

Instead, Jesus inserts IF into the conversation to show that relationships exist most powerfully when they root themselves in love and consent. And therefore, Jesus seeks not to issue an order in .v14. Rather, Jesus wants to give us a choice.

It is as though Jesus says, “All I can do is tell you what needs to happen. You have to choose whether or not it will be done.” With impending heartbreak approaching, Jesus knows better than anyone that nothing is certain when it comes to judging how human beings will respond in a given situation. Betrayed by Judas and denied by Peter, Jesus knows all too well that with human beings there is always an IF.   

Consequently, I've come to see the Christian life as being held together not by following orders, but by making choices. Sadly, there exists numerous incidents in church history where brother and sisters chose to bear fruit not of the Spirit, but of this fallen world. Having been despised, ridiculed and abused in the past, some Christians chose to live on a diet of hate, bitterness, and violence.

Now before we choose between cruelty and kindness, before we decide between callousness and gentleness, before we select between being impulsive or self-controlled; let us first consider the verses that follow v.14 in John 15 when Jesus goes on to say, “15 I no longer call you servants, because a servant does not know his master’s business. Instead, I have called you friends, for everything that I learned from my Father I have made known to you.”

Now pay close attention here in v.16. Jesus says, “16You did not choose me, but I chose you.” And for what purpose did Jesus choose us does it say here? Yes.  “So that you might go and bear fruit—fruit that will last.”

Hate, bitterness, violence; these are not the fruits Jesus commanded us to produce, nor do these fruits have a long shelf life. They begin to rot almost as soon as they sprout. However, the same cannot be said of the fruits of the Spirit. Love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; these are the fruits Jesus commanded us to bear, these are the fruits that last.

And while there will always be IFs with human beings, Jesus makes it clear that there are no IFs when it comes to God when he says, “and so that whatever you ask in my name, the Father will give you.” At no point does v.16 read, “the Father might give you,” or “the Father could possibly give you,” or “the Father is considering giving you.” No, it reads, “the Father will give you.”

Everyday our culture chooses to grow more and more comfortable with the breaking of every vow, guarantee, and commitment imaginable. So much so that we almost don’t know what we are looking at in v.16, which is a promise. A promise from God.

Finally, what is this command that indicates that we are Jesus' friends? What is it that Jesus says needs to happen? Jesus tries to make it as clear as possible in v. 17 when he says, “17This is my command: Love each other.” 

In this country and in our world, it seems like every other day we have reasons to fall to our knees and beg God to enforce the command to love each other. We think to ourselves that our country would be such a better place if God made love mandatory. We assume that our world would be at peace if only God would see to it that love was not optional.

 If such possibilities were true, then John 15 would have no meaning. However, if there is one thread of truth that runs throughout John 15, it is that love is most real, love is most powerful, love is most victorious when LOVE IS A CHOICE.

CJE                                                         

The Continuity Of Hope

Numbers 21:4-9

21:4 From Mount Or they set out by the way to the Red Sea, to go around the land of Edom; but the people became impatient on the way.21:5 The people spoke against God and against Moses, "Why have you brought us up out of Egypt to die in the wilderness? For there is no food and no water, and we detest this miserable food."

21:6 Then the LORD sent poisonous serpents among the people, and they bit the people, so that many Israelites died.21:7 The people came to Moses and said, "We have sinned by speaking against the LORD and against you; pray to the LORD to take away the serpents from us." So Moses prayed for the people.

21:8 And the LORD said to Moses, "Make a poisonous serpent, and set it on a pole; and everyone who is bitten shall look at it and live."21:9 So Moses made a serpent of bronze, and put it upon a pole; and whenever a serpent bit someone, that person would look at the serpent of bronze and live.

Good morning. Next month my parents will celebrate their 38th wedding anniversary. As one blessedly richly and enriched greatly by their commitment, I believe that a Godly marriage is the best gift parents could ever give their children.

In addition to all the lessons in love, patience, sacrifice and forgiveness; a Godly marriage also serves as a lesson in continuity where a family’s connections, successions, and unions go uninterrupted over time. While I believe marriage serves as a great illustration of continuity, I do not believe it is the only form in which continuity reveals itself.

I confess that trying to find continuity in the world and in our culture borders on impossible. Having spent almost ten years working in healthcare, I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard healthcare professionals invoke the phrase, “continuity of care,” like it actually exists. I often wonder how many people have had their continuity of care interrupted by an denial or an appeal.

Before cable television poisoned everything it touched, professional and collegiate sports acted as one of society’s last outposts for continuity. The fan assumed that their favorite player would stay with the same team for their entire career and the players use to enjoy the continuity of their spouses keeping the same friends and their kids staying in the same schools.

But if we struggle to find continuity in the world, then it is with great ease that we observe the wondrous continuity of God’s word down through the ages, and bear witness the continuity of God’s redemptive plan that continue its uninterrupted march into the future.  

By itself, this passage in Numbers 21 might seem out of place in the Christian faith. What possible connection can be found in a story about a people liberated from bondage becoming impatient and entitled? Only for mankind was freedom not enough that we would complain to the front desk about the maid service and send the food back to the kitchen.

Now what if I told you that over the next couple thousand years God’s redemptive plan would set events into motion that one day would link Numbers 21 to John 3 in a master stroke of continuity. I believe all of us are familiar with John 3:16. Now go back two verses and read,

3:14 And just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so must the Son of Man be lifted up,3:15 that whoever believes in him may have eternal life.3:16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not perish but may have eternal life.3:17 "Indeed, God did not send the Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.”

You see whether we realize it or not, we all have bitten by one poisonous serpent or another. Some have been bitten by pride, others have been bitten by lust. Then there are some who have been bitten by addiction, still there are others who have been bitten by violence. No, our chance at survival does not depend on gazing at a bronze serpent affixed on some pole. However, John 3 says that we will still have to look at something. If we want to live, our salvation demands that we look at our sin draped over the Son of Man nailed to a cross.

And with Easter approaching, it is important to note that the cross is not the end of the story. For God had still yet one more point of continuity waiting to be revealed. Is anyone familiar with the Jewish understanding of the term, “Mercy Seat?” It comes Exodus 25 and the instructions for making the ark of the covenant that held the Ten Commandments. Well on top of the ark a lid was placed that came to be called the mercy seat because in that space is where the cloud representing God’s presence rested. Here God was supposed to be seated, and from there God dispensed mercy.

Now listen closely to God’s design for the mercy seat and see if anything sounds familiar. Ex 25:17 “Make an atonement cover of pure gold—two and a half cubits long and a cubit and a half wide. 18 And make two cherubim out of hammered gold at the ends of the cover. 19 Make one cherub on one end and the second cherub on the other; make the cherubim of one piece with the cover, at the two ends. 20 The cherubim are to have their wings spread upward, overshadowing the cover with them. The cherubim are to face each other, looking toward the cover. 21 Place the cover on top of the ark and put in the ark the tablets of the covenant law that I will give you. 22 There, above the cover between the two cherubim that are over the Ark of the Covenant law, I will meet with you and give you all my commands for the Israelites."

Anything stand out? No? Well read v. 22 again,

“22 There, above the cover between the two cherubim that are over the Ark of the Covenant law, I will meet with you and give you all my commands for the Israelites.” To review we have a mercy seat, two angels, an empty space between them, and a God willing to meet in the empty space."

Is it really possible that God did it again? I mean bridging the span between Numbers 21 and John 3 is impressive enough. But for God’s continuity to overcome all the chaos and destruction in the world a second time, that really would be amazing. Well lets not get our hopes up, but lets turn to John 20 to see how close God came..

Read starting in v6, 

"6 Then Simon Peter came along behind him and went straight into the tomb. He saw the strips of linen lying there, 7 as well as the cloth that had been wrapped around Jesus’ head. The cloth was still lying in its place, separate from the linen. 8 Finally the other disciple, who had reached the tomb first, also went inside. He saw and believed. 9 (They still did not understand from Scripture that Jesus had to rise from the dead.) 10 Then the disciples went back to where they were staying."

Now this interesting, take a look at what Mary sees when she peers into the empty tomb...

"11 Now Mary stood outside the tomb crying. As she wept, she bent over to look into the tomb12 and saw two angels in white, seated where Jesus’ body had been, one at the head and the other at the foot. 13 They asked her, “Woman, why are you crying?” “They have taken my Lord away,” she said, “and I don’t know where they have put him.” 14 At this, she turned around and saw Jesus standing there, but she did not realize that it was Jesus."

You see Godly marriage isn’t the only source of continuity in this world. Because whether one lives in 1400 B.C., 80 A.D., or 2018, there exists a God who has always raised up occasions for salvation if we would look upon it. Moreover in 1400 BC, 80 AD, and 2018, there stands a God who has always expressed a willingness to meet us in the empty spaces of our lives.

And if continuity defines the Creator of the universe, then this week let us be creatures of continuity. Despite hatred’s attempts to disrupt, let us preserve the continuity of love that exists between us. Regardless of evil’s designs to corrupt, let us sustain the continuity of good that pours out from us. In spite of grief’s best efforts to interrupt, may we always remember that it can never disturb our continuity of hope.

CJE

Budgets and Consequences

Trump Budget Proposal For 2018

Good morning. Well as we emerge from the latest government shutdown, I thought it a good time to examine our government's budget and what it says about how those in power assign value to elemental resources that allow a society to breathe. Back in March 2017, the current administration released its proposed federal budget for 2018 and one quickly begins to see what matters most. 

Now to be fair, the overall budget proposed by the current administration is not all that different from the budgets of previous administrations. For if there is one commonality shared by Presidential budgets since WW II, then it exists in the reality of high defense spending ultimately results in sizable cuts to other critical resources.   

So while I am adamantly opposed to proposed budget listed above, I concede the federal budget process is a terrible burden loaded with extremely tough choices. Often times there are no good choices when it comes to finding a equilibrium between preserving security and procuring prosperity.

And yet I think it is important to ask ourselves, how long can we run the engine of American government at red-line before it overheats? How much malnutrition can we afford before the organs of American society start shutting down?

Speaking of malnutrition, lets take a look at what societal nutrients this proposed budget aims to cut. First, the budget seems determined to have the EPA operate on one leg by proposing 31% (2.6 billion dollars) cut to its funding. Even if such a cut improved our defenses, I would still question the necessity of defending any place where one could not breathe due to heavy smog or protecting any space that was under water?     

Second, the budget recommends a 14% (9.2 billion dollars) cut for the Department of Education. This reduction effectively reduces or eliminates several grant programs for teacher training, after-school programs, and support to poor and minority college students. If college isn't already difficult enough to afford, this budget also profoundly decreases federal work-study aid to college students. 

Third, the budget suggests a 18% (15.1 billion dollars) cut at the Department of Health and Human Services. The saddest victim of this reduction must be the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), which gives health coverage for children of the laboring poor. The budget would reduce CHIP funding by $5.8 billion between now and next year. I'll the first to admit wasteful spending in government is a real problem that we need to remedy, but I think we would all agree that it is not a waste to provide healthcare for sick poor children.

And then there is the Department of Defense. A department whose budget has not been cut in 70 years or more. The 2018 budget is no different as the departments stands to receive a 9% (52 billion dollars) increase. In the sixteen years since 9/11, the defense budget has ballooned from 287 billion to a proposed 639 billion in the 2018 budget. I do not question the need to procure adequate funds for those who bravely put themselves in harms way to maintain our defenses. I guess my question on defense spending is, "where is the ceiling?"

In an age or drones and nuclear weapons, does our government really need to continue funding programs aimed at killing more people with greater efficiency? In a press conference in 1963, President Kennedy voiced similar reservations on expanding our nuclear capability when he said,

To anyone who works in the laboratories today, a 30-megaton weapon is perhaps not as sophisticated as a 60- or 70- or 80-megaton weapon. But it’s still many, many, many times, dozens of times, stronger than the weapons that flattened Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
How many weapons do you need and how many megatons do you need to destroy? I said in my speech what we now have on hand, without any further testing, will kill 300 million people in one hour. I suppose they could even improve on that if it’s necessary.
— President Kennedy, August 20, 1963

So since we have already met the threshold for maximum destruction, why not divert such funding elsewhere to ensure veterans obtain the best healthcare possible or invest in our crumbling infrastructure that constantly finds its head under the ax of budget cuts.

I don't have the time now, but I encourage all of us to take time to do a Goggle search of reliable sources on US spending on defense compared to other world nations. I think you will find that other nations of similar size and abilities would need 5, 10, or even 20 years of spending to match one year of US defense spending.  

The campaign slogan of this current administration reads, "Make America Great Again." However, it seems to me that the administration's budget proposal for 2018 works against this pledge. I mean how can any society can be made great when past and present administrations continue to weaken their commitment to Justice, Transportation, Housing, Health, Education, Labor, Agriculture, and the Environment?

Again I don't pretend to have easy answers or quick fixes. I just think the time has come for deeper reflection on budgets, and even greater consideration of the consequences.   

CJE

PSA 3: Social Media Is Not Social.

: tending to form cooperative and interdependent relationships with others
— definition of Social, Merriam-Webster Dictionary

Good morning. Minus this blog, January 2018 marks one year since I left Facebook, Instagram and all other forums of social media. I suppose it was back in the fall of 2016 when I felt that social media was detrimental to my well-being and disruptive to my peace. At that time I noticed much of social media becoming increasingly polluted by toxic disputes regarding the Presidential election and the rash of unarmed black men killed by police officers. 

Rather than bringing people together for conversations directed at understanding, I came to see that social media actually served as a mechanism that pushed people farther apart into shouting matches aimed at condemnation. The more space social media puts between those who disagree, the more it pushes both sides to the extremes. It wasn't long before I observed some friends and family abandon the middle ground to become extremist without even realizing it. 

Others are welcome to disagree, but I believe polarization, isolation, and extremism become inevitable when one prefers to communicate their thoughts and desires electronically. This leads me to the second reason I stopped using social media. In addition to being disheartened by the growing hatred and division, I also felt discouraged by the decay of some friendships brought on by social media. 

Before social media, I looked forward to birthday phone calls or calls from friends to let me know they were engaged or expecting their first child. Then social media took hold and the slow decay of some friendships started. It did happen all at once, but in bits and pieces. First the birthday calls didn't come, then even birthday texts stopped. It wasn't long before it became apparent that simply posting, "Happy Birthday Chris!" on my Facebook wall satisfied the requirements of friendship.

Looking back, I believe the first crack in my view of social media came when I had to tell some Facebook friends Marcus had passed away weeks earlier because they didn't yet know about the worst day in my life. Yeah I think it was then that I realized that something had to change.

Now I know that the couple hundred Facebook friends I had accumulated loved me very much then and still do today. It's just that after losing Marcus, the occasional sound of a person's voice or the sporadic warmth of another's hug made any day temperate. The days you don't hear or feel anything at all, those are the days that are the coldest.  

In thinking about the fallacies of social media, I thought it would be helpful to look at what it means to be social. By its definition, social implies a tendency to form cooperative and interdependent relationships with others. So perhaps the way our society becomes less combative and more cooperative is by people using their phone to make a call rather than post a tweet. Maybe the means by which I depend more on you and rely more on me is by sitting down together at the dinner table instead seated before our perspective keyboards.  

I've made peace with the fact that most of my friends and family will continue to use Facebook and Instagram as their news outlet for birthdays, engagements, weddings, and pregnancies. Consequently, I've come to accept the likelihood that future updates about my friends and family will come second-hand or not at all. 

So even if you see more positives than negatives to social media, I would encourage all of us this week to find opportunities to be more personable and less electronic. May all of us look for chances to be more spontaneous and less automated. However, I don't think it would hurt to consider the possibility that social media isn't social. 

CJE